Just of recent New Year, it has come to our attention the announcement of TK on his blog:
He is implying that our last skin, was a copy of his last skin.
We have analysed everything he said, it is unfortunate that we have to show evidence proving the contrary, when clearly there is no need of one.
The new skin was done weeks ago, even before he even released his skin files.
We only hold it would be a great New Year gift to our followers.
Our skin was used on the presentation of showing it as upcoming skin in 2012-12-08;
And even previously, it was used to showoff the Eyes N2 we have released in 2012-11-30, which was done even before.
As the Eyes were a CC pack, we planned to release them one by one, and we have been doing.
So just take the date of the first release, Eyes N1, better, on the publish of the Eye Collection, which was in 2012-11-26 and subtract that date.
It was sent to release even before as I only have time to do that on weekends.
Get the post and downloads ready so that later we just publish on the press of a button.
A skin texture really just doesn’t get done in one week or two, which is what he is implying we have done.
We all have our life and work to do, and we use our free time for our hobbies.
Knowing well the concept and difficulty of what it is the 2D mapping and texturing, specially when it comes to this.
His arguments are not very direct, pointing to details that got along ever since the BASE skin, to the draw and evolution of a new one.
There is the obvious copy, but to say we used his skin, clearly need more investigation than what one had done in one day.
This is what LL shows on her topic, to make note for the geometry shape, and texture detail spots.
Not everyone has the vision on the technical ways that is applied over the skin design.
This isn’t to come up against anyone, but as much as we’d want to become clear, some may take other things, even irrelevant ones, as an argument to decide what is really going on.
So it doesn’t matter if for both sides, show the history and development of the skin making, it won’t make any difference.
To TK, if you want to solve this matter, you contact us, as through that, we won’t make this any further.
Whether you decide to continue this on public, but don’t come to try affect us any more than of what you already have.
By this time QQ viable way or email us: sclub@mktm.co.uk
As this has come to public, all we need now is support, study it yourself.
But don’t waste too much time, as this is just a game, CC, is not that important, nor relevant to no one life.
The importance is to maintain integrity, because nothing was done.
But at the end it won’t make any difference, the truth lies where it is, whether you believe or not.
==================================================================================
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_63e832e00102e55e.html
昨天在外婆家,看到TK的质疑确实震惊和意外,奈何第一感觉是愤怒,发表了不当言辞,我可以先道个歉,大家对我过激言辞的批评我也欣然接受,希望没有影响 到大家过节的心情,今天对TK的质疑,我想我还是保持理性，只解释这一次,因为相信柠檬的人依然会支持我,不相信的人可能看都不看的继续抨击我,也许只有 对此事,态度持中,心存好奇的人,才会把这些仔细看完,所以,清者自清也许就是这样了吧,大家都不是傻子,上图,自己分析,自己看就好了。
既然TK先提出了关于“抄袭”的言论，我想未必是太“敏感”了？既然捅破这层纸，我也不吐不快。
我很不喜欢别人断章取义，我从来没说过不参考EA自带texture，眼睛位置，嘴巴位置，耳朵，鼻孔我想没有
人在不参考EA前提下自己把位置定的下来。只是EA自带的效果确实不敢恭维。
就用美术专业知识来说,什么东西不是分三源色,高光,灰色调和阴影,同个物体,同阳光源就是一样的,这种两个眼睛一只鼻子,一张嘴巴的皮肤更是如此,都是用EA的原皮做基础,唯一不同的是每个作者的绘画手法。
如果要看材质，我们大可从最开始说起。如要把发布时间推到一个制高点上，那我们先看下之前皮肤各阶段的
时间节点：
1.0的皮肤还在摸索阶段，但我想说明的是，从光泽到色彩，我的颜色一直到S站新出的皮肤相差都不算太“跨越”，而且在1.0的男皮我就在摸索深咖色黑皮的概念了，只是勾勒的没那么大胆。
内眼走向，眼袋弧度，1.0就这样画了，后文我也可以做详细说明。 至于关于TK提到脸部光泽，我打一开始就是以淡阴影为主，颧骨位稍重色，脸夹略浅色，这样脸部又有立体，才会透气。但TK版皮一开始并非如此，二版之后脸颊重色逐步减弱，难道我可以借题发挥说TK抄袭我的？显然那是不可取的。
这些变化大家都是看在眼里，我重来可没说这是什么抄袭，因为我们走的完全是不同风格。我也不敢说我多圣人，每版皮肤的推陈出新，都向一个完美的方向发展无可厚非，如果非要拿这个鸡毛当令箭，那所有M3M2的都有互抄嫌疑。
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
如非要拿图来做证，下面是一些细节的对比个例：
这是TK版脸皮的texture，2010年10月下旬发布
仔细看下眼角和眼待的走向
这是柠檬皮第一版，2011年2月中
仔细看下眼角和眼待的走向
对于以上种种我从来没说过什么,即便我觉得我们的皮肤有相近之处,但想想也只觉得是,作为一个作者都希望自己的作品日趋完美，偶尔有碰撞也是情理之中。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 如果再扯到S站的皮肤，我更无话可说，光泽肌理效果完全是两回事。
我们的皮肤，一步一步走来，都是有目共睹的，不是说抄袭了谁，参考了谁，如果真要说，我还参考了达芬奇的人体结构呢，我还参考了蕾诺阿的冷暖对比呢，我还参考了法国印象派。。。。我范的着要这么做吗，清者自清，我想你也应该那么认为。
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
最后来说下新发布的皮肤，可能是发布时间上的重叠，TK会如此敏感？先说下时间，我们早在几个月前就开始做新版的二版皮肤，主要就是针对肌理效果的调整，同样是在上一版上的修改。
我想皮肤质感和纹理完全是不同的，TK眼袋的问题，之前历史问题提到的先不说，我一直是那么画的，何来抄袭？
以上图可见，眼袋的形状，宽度，我基本都跟之前皮肤变化不大，也许是我本来就还没好的创意，算在吃老本吧。如果单是说我在眼袋正下方加了清晰轮廓线就是抄袭，那也太敏感了。
我11月发布的模特海报，已经使用的是新皮。
http://bbs.gamesir.com/thread-166976-1-1.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
最后想说,柠檬,西瓜,MK因为同一个游戏走在一起,自己花钱建立了网站,一起研究,制作自定义,是我们的生活,工作之余的乐趣所在,既然是乐趣,就不希 望掺杂这些个事情,不过有事也不怕,大家说开了,误会消除了是最好,如果不能我们也不会放弃SIMS这个兴趣,依然会创作自定义给大家分享,Sims是个 大舞台,百花齐放才能让这个舞台更精彩,对于作者之间的关系,希望能少些猜忌和敌对,多些赞美和支持,相信大家相处起来也会和谐,愉快很多.
希望一切都是误会，我尊敬TK的同时，希望TK不要再纠结这个问题，互相捏架毫无意义。不然我只能说是“欲加之罪何患无辞”。
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.